&lt;p&gt;Because conventional Radiation Hardness assurance is predicated on having data specific to the part (and possibly on the particular wafer diffusion lot of that part)&amp;nbsp;being considered for flight, it has been difficult to adapt to cubesat, Class-D and other risk-tolerant mission platforms.&amp;nbsp; Indeed, even for missions with low risk tolerance, it has&amp;nbsp;not been possible to place quantitative bounds on risk arising from radiation threats prior to obtaining part-specific data relevant for the application.&amp;nbsp; Often, the best that could be done would be to look at less specific data to seek qualitative reassurance that parts would ultimately fulfill their requirements.&amp;nbsp; Such data include:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Historical Data--radiation test data for the same part type, but different lots tested in the past.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Similarity or Process Data--Radiation test data for similar parts fabricated in the same semiconductor process as the flight parts&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Heritage data--data regarding the past successful use of the flight parts in previous similar missions&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Each of these data types poses challenges, and to date, use of these types of data has been qualitative.&amp;nbsp; We propose use of Bayesian probability to use these data types to develop quantitative radiation risk metrics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For short, risk-tolerant missions, often the most significant risks arise from single-event effects, which due to their Poisson nature can occur at any time during the mission.&amp;nbsp; Because single-event effects susceptibility is usually considered negligible from one&amp;nbsp;wafer diffusion lot to another and from part to part within a wafer diffusion lot, we concentrate on use of similarity data and heritage data.&amp;nbsp; The method addresses ways to limit the influence of the initial prior probability distribution so that the resulting distributions and discusses ways to develop statistics that are relevant to the SEE risks being considered, but still form compact distributions in the analysis.&amp;nbsp; The attached paper and presentation give details and the general philosophy of the method.&lt;/p&gt;